Last week, you analyzed whether Dan Defendant was guilty of receiving stolen property
Last week, you analyzed whether Dan Defendant was guilty of receiving stolen property
Last week, you analyzed whether Dan Defendant was guilty of receiving stolen property. In your initial discussion post for this week, you now need to convince the court of your conclusion. Revise your analysis to be a persuasive argument following the IRAC format. In your response posts, provide feedback to your colleagues about the effectiveness of their persuasive writing. This can include feedback about tone, language, and the strength of their legal argument. You can also include a discussion about whether you think the argument would be successful.
Use the same law you used in your Paper 1 analysis*. Those sources are listed below:
Section 570.030.1 RSMo
State v. Garcia, 587 S.W.3d 688 (Mo. App. W.D. 2019)
*Assume the law you have been provided is correct. You do not need to cite check for this assignment. You should, however, correctly cite the law you use in your argument.
Requirements: 1 page
Law
Answer preview for the paper on ‘Last week, you analyzed whether Dan Defendant was guilty of receiving stolen property’
APA 323 words
Click the purchase button below to download full answer…….