Develop interprofessional teams that promote quality care, reduce risk, and improve complex healthcare delivery systems

Develop interprofessional teams that promote quality care, reduce risk, and improve complex healthcare delivery systems

Module 4 Signature Assignment Part 3: Quality Improvement Implementation
Purpose
• Develop quality improvement project goals based on evidence. CLO 2) (PLO 4)
• Apply change management and QI models to develop a policy change.


Overview

In Part 3 of the Signature Assignment, you will fully develop the components of your quality improvement project. You will continue to use the Improvement Project Worksheet from Ogrinc et al. (2022) to guide your project. This paper will address Steps 3-6:

  • Understanding the Process
  • Specific Aim
  • Measures
  • Identify and Choose a Change Strategy

Note: It is recommended that you read or review the overview of the entire Signature Assessment series of assignments. Download the overview of the entire Signature Assessment series of assignments.

Action Items

  1. Reread Chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, & 7 in Ogrinc et al. (2022).
  2. Complete Steps 3, 4, 5, 6 in the Improvement Project Worksheet (Ogrinc et al., 2022, p. 163). Copy and paste the worksheet as Appendix A at the end of your paper.
  3. Develop a 3- to 5-page paper (excluding cover page, references, and appendices) that addresses the following:
    1. Quality improvement process
      1. Context – Readiness to change
      2. Evidence of teamwork quality culture
      3. Diagnosis of system performance
      4. Process map
      5. Fishbone diagram
    2. Aims of this project
      1. SMART Goal
      2. Process Aim
    3. Measurements (target/benchmarks)
      1. Desired results
      2. How will you know the change is an improvement (measurement)?
    4. Strategies to implement the change
      1. Identify a quality improvement model and describe how you would apply it to this project.
  4. By the due date indicated, upload your paper.

Grading Criteria

Please refer to the rubric for information on how your work will be assessed. Please also ask your instructor for any clarification as needed.

This assignment is also used to assess DNP Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs) through the rubric. The PLO assessment will appear as separate rows within the rubric; they will not contribute points to the assignment.

For your information, the following PLOs are being assessed:

  • PLO 3: Strategically lead improvements in health outcomes, quality, safety, and policy.
  • PLO 4: Develop interprofessional teams that promote quality care, reduce risk, and improve complex healthcare delivery systems.

Rubric

Signature Assignment 3

Signature Assignment 3
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction & Conclusion10 to >9.0 pts The student introduces the topic and indicates the purpose of the paper thoroughly, and provides sufficient background information on the topic and presents clearly how the information is connected to their understanding of the topic(s). The student’s conclusion expertly summarizes how they have developed a deeper understanding and provide abundant evidence of critical thought. 9 to >8.0 pts The student introduces the topic and indicates the purpose of the paper, and provides background information on the topic and presents how the information is connected to their understanding regarding the topic(s). The student’s conclusion summarizes how they have developed some understanding and provide evidence of critical thought. 8 to >0 pts The student does not introduce the topic or indicate the purpose of the paper, or does not provide background information on the topic or present how the information is connected to their understanding on the topic(s). The student’s conclusion fails to summarize how they have developed understanding and/or did not provide evidence of critical thought.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic Information (CLO 2, 3 PLO 3, 4)40 to >34.0 pts The student completes steps 3, 4, 5, 6 in the Improvement Project Worksheet. The student includes a thorough treatment of all points in the instructions, includes well-developed discussions of the main ideas of what they have learned as they compiled their findings and reflection to write the paper, and provides abundant evidence of analysis and critical thought. 34 to >33.0 pts The student completes steps 3, 4, 5, 6 in the Improvement Project Worksheet. The student includes a summary of treatment of all points in the instructions, includes discussions of the main ideas of what they have learned as they compiled their findings and/or reflection to write the paper, and provides evidence of analysis and critical thought. The content is somewhat accurate and relevant. 33 to >0 pts The student completes some or all of the steps 3, 4, 5, 6 in the Improvement Project Worksheet, but poorly – or not at all. The student does not include a satisfactory treatment of all points in the instructions, or discussions of the main points of what they have learned as they compiled their findings or reflection to write the paper. They provide little evidence of analysis or critical thought. The content is neither accurate nor relevant.40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Requirements (CLO 4)40 to >34.0 pts The content flows and is exceptionally well-organized, logical, and meets the length requirement; uses correct English grammar and sentence structure; demonstrates no spelling errors or typographical errors. 34 to >33.0 pts The content flows, exhibits a somewhat logical progression, and meets the length requirement; uses correct English grammar and sentence structure with few errors; demonstrates few spelling errors or typographical errors. 33 to >0 pts The student does not follow APA guidelines in citing and referencing sources, uses few scholarly resources to support their rationale, and includes a title page and references page that does not follow APA guidelines. The content does not flow or progress logically; does not use correct English grammar, sentence structure, or mechanics.40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Requirements (CLO 4)10 to >9.0 pts The student follows APA guidelines in citing and referencing sources, uses scholarly resources as required to support their rationale, and includes a title page and references page that follows APA guidelines. 9 to >8.0 pts The student mostly follows APA guidelines in citing and referencing sources, uses some scholarly resources as required to support their rationale, and includes a title page and references page that mostly follows APA guidelines. 8 to >0 pts The student does not follow APA guidelines in citing and referencing sources, uses few scholarly resources to support their rationale, and includes a title page and references page that does not follow APA guidelines.10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLO 3: Strategically lead improvements in health outcomes, quality, safety, and policy. threshold: 3.0 pts3 ptsProficient 2 ptsAcceptable 1 ptsUnacceptable—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLO 4: Develop interprofessional teams that promote quality care, reduce risk, and improve complex healthcare delivery systems. threshold: 3.0 pts3 ptsProficient 2 ptsAcceptable 1 ptsUnacceptable—
Total Points: 100

Requirements: PER PRIOR WRITE UPS   |   .doc file

PHD Health & Medical

Answer preview for the paper on ‘Develop interprofessional teams that promote quality care, reduce risk, and improve complex healthcare delivery systems’

healthcare delivery systems

APA 2188 words

Click the purchase button below to download full answer…….