analyze the alignment among the problem, purpose, and research questions in three completed capstone studies
analyze the alignment among the problem, purpose, and research questions in three completed capstone studies
For this Assignment, you will analyze the alignment among the problem, purpose, and research questions in three completed capstone studies. This practice dissecting someone else’s work will help prepare you to ensure alignment in your own work.
To prepare for this Assignment:
- Review the three exemplar dissertations.
- For each one, analyze and take notes on the alignment among the problem, purpose, and research question(s).
- Write an analysis that addresses the prompts provided in the assignment instructions below.
Adesanya, O. (2019). Associations between healthcare utilization factors and diabetic retinopathy among adult African Americans, Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/7580/
Jungbauer, R.M. (2017). HPV vaccination, sociodemographic variables, and physician recommendation in select U.S. areas, Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4640/
Sana, B.Y. (2019). Risk factors associated with the contraction of Ebola virus disease in Liberia, Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/6860/
Write a 4-page analysis of the alignment among problem, purpose, and research questions for each of the three exemplars. In doing so, be sure to:
- Discuss how the problem drives the purpose.
- Describe how the RQ is centered around the problem and purpose.
- Point out details of how the problem, purpose, and RQ(s) complement one another.
- Support your analysis and conclusions with specific references to the exemplars.
| PUBH_8514_Module3_Assignment1_Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWrite an analysis of the alignment among the problem, purpose, and RQs for each of the three exemplars, in which you:Discuss how the problem drives the purpose and describe how the RQ is centered around the problem and purpose. | 6 to >5.0 ptsOutstandingThe discussion of how the problem drives the purpose is fully developed, exceptional, and insightful, and the description of how the RQ is centered around the problem and purpose is fully developed, exceptional, and insightful. 5 to >4.0 ptsVery GoodThe discussion of how the problem drives the purpose is generally thorough and well-organized, and the description of how the RQ is centered around the problem and purpose is generally thorough and well-organized. 4 to >3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe discussion of how the problem drives the purpose is limited, but adequate, and the description of how the RQ is centered around the problem and purpose is limited, but adequate. 3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe discussion of how the problem drives the purpose is unclear, inaccurate, or missing, or the description of how the RQ is centered around the problem and purpose is unclear, inaccurate, or missing. | 6 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify details of how the problem, purpose and RQs complement one another. | 5 to >4.0 ptsOutstandingThe details of how the problem, purpose, and RQs complement one another are fully developed, exceptional, and insightful. 4 to >3.5 ptsVery GoodThe details of how the problem, purpose, and RQs complement one another are generally thorough and well-organized. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe details of how the problem, purpose, and RQs complement one another are somewhat limited but result in adequate work. 3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe details of how the problem, purpose, and RQs complement one another are unclear, inaccurate, or missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport your analysis and conclusions with specific references to the exemplars. | 5 to >4.0 ptsOutstandingReferences to the exemplars that support the analysis and conclusions are fully developed, exceptional, and insightful. 4 to >3.5 ptsVery GoodReferences to the exemplars that support the analysis and conclusions are generally thorough and well-organized. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsReferences to the exemplars that support the analysis and conclusions are somewhat limited but result in adequate work. 3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsReferences to the exemplars that support the analysis and conclusions are unclear, infrequent, or missing. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly WritingExtent to which the work demonstrates doctoral-level writing with proper grammar, mechanics, tone, vocabulary, and spelling as well as proper paragraph structure, each with clear central ideas. In addition, any sources are referenced properly. | 4 to >3.5 ptsOutstandingThe work is exceptionally clear and coherent. Student writes with exemplary grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation to convey their scholarly message. The work displays exemplary scholarly voice, organization, and focus. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsVery GoodThe work is clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (two to four), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The work displays effective scholarly voice, organization, and focus. 3 to >2.0 ptsMeets ExpectationsThe work is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (five to 10) and occasionally interfere with the message. The work has lapses in scholarly voice. The work lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. 2 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsThe work lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (11+), and interfere with the message. The work shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus. | 4 pts |
| Total Points: 20 | ||
Requirements: | .doc file
PHD Global Health
Answer preview for the paper on ‘analyze the alignment among the problem, purpose, and research questions in three completed capstone studies’
APA 1235 words
Click the purchase button below to download full answer…….