Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week
Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week
NURS_500 Week 4 Sociologic Sciences Journal assignment
Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study
Links to an external site.– https://webapps.srm-app.net/CanvasContent/SF/WCU_NURS_500_DE_TEMPLATE/Case_Studies/W4%20-%20Sociologic%20Sciences%20Interactive%20Case%20Study/wcu_nurs_500_sociologic_sciences_interactive_case_study.html
Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week. Associate what you have learned about the theories to this case study, and then see the instructions below to complete a journal entry about your experience.
During weeks 2 & 4, you will complete interactive case studies and be asked to associate what you have learned about theory in comparison to the case study and reflect on it.
Each time you have completed a case study, submit your reflection. Each reflection should include the following:
- A comparison of what you have learned from the case study to related theories you have studied. Make sure to cite these theories in APA format.
- A comparison of the case study to your nursing practice, giving one or two examples from your nursing experience in which you might have applied a particular theory covered.
Your reflection should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs.
Rubric
NURS_500_DE – Case Study Rubric
| NURS_500_DE – Case Study Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis | 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expectations Presents an exemplary articulation and insightful analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers detailed and specific examples for all questions. Makes keen observations, making note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are professionally sound and creative; they are supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Draws insightful and comprehensive conclusions and solutions. 16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectations Presents an accurate analysis of significant concepts and/or theories presented in the case. Offers some detail and some examples for most questions. Makes occasional note of essential information provided in the case. Ideas are mostly supported by scientific evidence that is credible and timely. Makes some attempt to draw conclusions and solutions. 15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expectations Provides insufficient explanations of significant concepts. Offers little or insignificant detail and no examples for most questions. Fails to address essential information provided in the case. Ideas are generally unsupported by scientific evidence, but some attempt has been made. Fails to draw conclusion. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Does not, or incorrectly, answers with insufficient explanations. Information is not scientifically sound. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | 20 to >16.4 pts Meets Expectations Makes insightful, clear and accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a comprehensive, high-level understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 16.4 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectations Makes mostly accurate connections to key concepts and relevant theories. Response indicates a general understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 15 to >11.8 pts Falls Below Expectations Provides several insufficient or inaccurate explanations, although attempts are made to address some key concepts. Response indicates an introductory understanding of the concepts presented in the case. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Information is inaccurate or inadequate. Response indicates little or no understanding of the concepts presented in the case. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | 7.5 to >6.15 pts Meets Expectations Answers are well written throughout. Information is well organized and clearly communicated. Assignment is free of spelling and grammatical errors. 6.15 to >5.63 pts Approaches Expectations Answers are well written throughout and the information is reasonably organized and communicated. Assignment is mostly free of spelling and grammatical errors. 5.63 to >4.43 pts Falls Below Expectations Answers are somewhat organized and lacks some clarity. Contains some spelling and grammatical errors. 4.43 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Answers are not well written and lack clarity. Information is poorly organized. Assignment contains many spelling and grammatical errors. | 7.5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format | 2.5 to >2.05 pts Meets Expectations Follows all the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. 2.05 to >1.88 pts Approaches Expectations Follows length requirement and most of the requirements related to format, source citations, and layout. 1.88 to >1.48 pts Falls Below Expectations Follows most of the requirements related to format, length, source citations, and layout. 1.48 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Does not follow format, length, source citations, and layout requirements. | 2.5 pts |
NURS 521 Week 4 Article Summary and Review Essay assignment
Choose one of the articles below, and address the essay prompt associated with it. You will need to log in to the WCU library to access the full article.
Park, M. (2009). Ethical issues in nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Law, 13(3), 68-77. doi:10.1891/1073-7472.13.3.68
Link: Ethical issues in nursing practice Links to an external site.
Essay Prompt: Identify primary areas for legal and ethical issues faced by oncology nurses in this study (Park, 2009), and strategies they may have developed to work with those ethical issues.
Or,
Croke, E. (2006). Nursing malpractice: determining liability elements for negligent acts. Journal of Legal Nurse Consulting, 17(3), 3.
Link: Nursing malpractice: determining liability elements for negligent actsLinks to an external site.
Essay Prompt: Identify primary problems that led to the malpractice suits (Croke, 2006), and identify the role the nurse played and what the nurse did wrong.
Your 1-2 page paper should include adhere to APA formatting and references/ citations for the article. Additional sources are optional.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
NURS_521_DE – Paper/Essay Rubric (1)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent | 20 to >17.2 pts Proficient The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment. 17.2 to >15.0 pts Approaches Proficiency The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not be thorough. 15 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The writer does not respond to the assignment. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail | 18 to >15.48 pts Proficient There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information. 15.48 to >13.5 pts Approaches Proficiency There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information. 13.5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The topic and main ideas are not clear. | 18 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization | 14 to >12.04 pts Proficient The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong. 12.04 to >10.5 pts Approaches Proficiency The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included. 10.5 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion. | 14 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA | 8 to >6.88 pts Proficient The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. 6.88 to >6.0 pts Approaches Proficiency The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. 6 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing. | 8 pts |
Requirements: Your 1-2 page paper should include adhere to APA formatting and references/ citations for the article and reflection should be a minimum of five to six paragraphs.
Hi will you be willing to sign into my student portal to get the information for these assignment.
https://canvas.westcoastuniversity.edu/courses/28497/discussion_topics/563024
crawlins2@u.westcoastuniversity.edu
PW:14RC05519/23
Answer preview for the paper on ‘Complete the Sociologic Sciences Interactive Case Study following the readings and presentation for this week’
APA 741 words
Click the purchase button below to download full answer…….