The goal of an argument research proposal is to create a working argument stance and a basic plan that considers context
The goal of an argument research proposal is to create a working argument stance and a basic plan that considers context
ASSIGNMENT
The goal of an argument research proposal is to create a working argument stance and a basic plan that considers context, audience, and purpose and that presents potential approaches to research.
Keep in mind that rather than being an outline or structural plan for your essay, this proposal should ground you in the conversation, should offer direction for research needs, and should give your professor ample focused material viable for providing effective feedback before you begin researching and writing.
INSTRUCTIONS
Review the course theme announcement carefully. Select the topic that you intend to use during the course for your Argument Research Essay. Review the Argument Research Essay Overview for a broad look at the essay guidelines.
Next, review the Week 2 Argument Research Essay Proposal Example to see a sample idea of how to complete the template. Then, download the Week 2 Argument Research Essay Template, complete all the sections pertaining to the course theme topic selected, save and submit to the Week 2 assignment area. Be sure to complete all THREE sections of the template.
FORMATTING
Complete the template by filling in the blank areas for each section according to the instructions.
LENGTH
1–2 pages
GRADING
This activity will be graded based on the Argument Research Essay Proposal Rubric found in Canvas.
OUTCOMES
1, 2, 6, 8
DUE DATE
By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Rubric
Research Argument Essay Proposal
| Research Argument Essay Proposal | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStance | 20 pts The debate is chosen from the options provided and includes an arguable stance within the debate. 16 pts The debate is chosen from the options provided and includes a statement of stance within the debate that may not be viable for an argument essay. 12 pts The debate is chosen from the options provided, but the statement is not arguable. The stance statement may be a statement of fact and not an argument. 0 pts The debate is not chosen from the options provided or is off-topic. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons for Viability | 20 pts In at least 3 sentences, the reasons for the stance being viable are discussed well, with specific reasons that support the goals of an argument essay. 16 pts In at least 3 sentences, the reasons for the stance being viable are discussed with reasons that support the goals of an argument essay. The sentences may lack detail or focus toward argument. 12 pts The reasons for the stance being viable are discussed in fewer than 3 sentences or are lacking in specificity or an argument focus. 0 pts The debate is not chosen from the options provided or is off-topic. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOpposing Viewpoints | 20 pts In at least 3 sentences, the student addresses viable possible opposing viewpoints and explains why others might reasonably disagree with the student’s stance. 16 pts In at least 3 sentences, the student addresses viable possible opposing viewpoints and explains why others might disagree with the student’s stance. The opposing viewpoints may fall short of being reasonable viewpoints, or the explanation may lack logic. 12 pts Possible opposing viewpoints are discussed in fewer than 3 sentences or are lacking in specificity or an argument focus. 0 pts No possible opposing viewpoints are addressed, or the viewpoints are off-topic. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience | 20 pts In at least 2 sentences, the student addresses the audience for the proposed essay. The discussion of audience reflects a strong understanding of readers and of invested groups. 16 pts In at least 2 sentences, the student addresses the audience for the proposed essay. The discussion of audience reflects an understanding of readers and of invested groups, although the response may lack detail or reasons may lack specificity. 12 pts The student addresses the audience for the proposed essay. The discussion of audience may reflect a need for a deeper understanding of readers and of invested groups. The response may lack detail or reasons may lack specificity. 0 pts No discussion of audience is attempted, or the discussion of audience is off-topic. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParagraph of Understanding and Needs | 35 pts In a paragraph of 7-9 rich sentences, the student thoroughly addresses the knowns and unknowns regarding the student’s chosen debate with strong detail and in a manner conducive to beginning research and writing. 30 pts In a paragraph of 7-9 sentences, the student addresses the knowns and unknowns regarding the student’s chosen debate. The paragraph may lack detail or may not be fully conducive to beginning research and writing. 23 pts The student addresses the knowns and unknowns regarding the student’s chosen debate, but the paragraph lacks length, depth, or viability toward research and writing. 0 pts The paragraph is either missing or is off-topic. | 35 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Terms | 20 pts Five viable search phrases are listed, and the list covers discovering information, supporting the student’s stance, and addressing opposing viewpoints. 16 pts Five viable search phrases are listed, and the list covers most of the following goals: discovering information, supporting the student’s stance, and addressing opposing viewpoints. 12 pts Viable search phrases are listed, but fewer than five, or the list does not cover more than one of the following goals: discovering information, supporting the student’s stance, and addressing opposing viewpoints. 0 pts Search terms are not listed or are off-topic. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument Formatting and Writing: Mechanics and Usage | 5 pts The assignment document itself displays correct APA Style in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing is free of errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 4 pts The assignment document may have small errors in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing contains minor errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. 3 pts The assignment document may have major errors in headers, pagination, and title page. The writing contains numerous distracting errors in grammar, spelling, or punctuation. 0 pts The assignment document may completely lack APA formatting (header, pagination, title page) and/or may contain enough errors that reader comprehension is difficult. | 5 pts |
Course theme for essay: Technology and its power in society
Possible topic ideas:
- Technology biases in face recognition
- Siri listening in on conversations and then targeting ads to specific users
- Home personal assistance (Google Home, Alexa, etc.) uses
- The use of artificial intelligence (AI) (many different forms to choose from)
- The use of cell phones and the inability to be without them (ie. can’t entertain oneself anymore, can’t just talk to another person)
See attached the template to be completed and also an example.
Keep in mind that this proposal will be used for a formal essay later on.
Requirements: | .doc file
This is just an essay proposal for a complete essay I’ll have to discuss weeks later.
Answer preview for the paper on ‘The goal of an argument research proposal is to create a working argument stance and a basic plan that considers context’
APA 705 words
Click the purchase button below to download full answer…….